Choosing an Educational Visits Training Provider
Educational Visits Coordinator (EVC)
Visit Leader Training
(VL)
Introduction
Health & safety law requires schools to provide adequate and appropriate training for staff involved in educational visits. This information sheet will help you identify and select a competent training provider to deliver such training, based on your specific needs.
EVCs should undertake initial EVC Training of 6 hours duration. This could be delivered via face-to-face, online facilitated or blended training, including e-learning. EVCs should subsequently attend a revalidation course of 3 hours duration every 3 years.
Visit Leaders should undertake Visit Leader Training every three years. This could be delivered via a face-to-face, online-facilitated, blended or e-learning method.
Due Diligence
When selecting a training provider, you should check that:
trainers/assessors are appropriately qualified, and
monitoring and quality assurance systems are in place, and
teaching standards and content is relevant, and
certification is provided.
Don’t just rely on a badge, check what is behind the badge. There are many logos attached to training providers, some from ‘awarding organisations’. Do not just rely on the badge; it is the employer’s duty to check the provider’s offer is suitable and sufficient. A membership/body badge alone is not likely to be sufficient.
Quality Assurance
Ensure the training provider maintains rigorous quality assurance processes, including internal and external reviews. Training materials and assessments must align with current best practices and national standards.
Certification
Certificates issued to staff who complete Educational Visits Training should include:
- The name of the training provider;
- The title of the course;
- The date of issue and expiration;
- Trainer’s name.
Training FAQs
-
Trainers/assessors should have the knowledge and competence outlined in OEAP NG 3.4d Outdoor Education Adviser.
Trainers should evidence both the competence to teach (see Table 2) and should hold competence in the subject they are delivering.
The list in Table 2 below is not exhaustive but provides a guide to acceptable training and assessing qualifications. Trainers who assess student competence should hold a qualification (or separate qualifications) that enables them to perform both functions. A training organisation may use different individuals to train and assess students, and they should hold qualifications appropriate for their role.
-
The training organisation should have:
· a suitable and documented quality assurance plan designating an individual to take responsibility for quality assurance, including assessment of the skills of trainers/assessors at least annually. This ‘designated person’, who can be from inside or outside the organisation, should be independent of training delivery and demonstrate competence for their role:
· a documented course evaluation procedure that includes feedback from students;
· a documented complaints procedure;
· a mechanism for retaining a detailed record of assessments for each student and store those records for a minimum of three years after completion of the course;
· sufficient quantity of well-maintained equipment that permits students to complete their training and assessment within the appropriate number of contact hours.
-
Training organisations should demonstrate that class size is appropriate.
Where your candidates for training have learning or communication difficulties these should be communicated to your training provider. The training provider should then make reasonable adjustments to accommodate their learning needs, eg provision of additional learning support.
-
Some training providers offer training that is a mix of e-learning and face-to-face training. This is known as blended learning and is an accepted means by which training can be delivered. It is important that you conduct the necessary additional checks (due diligence) to decide if this method is suitable. This means you should make sure you are satisfied that:
· the individual being trained knows how to use the technology that delivers the training;
· the training provider has an adequate means of supporting the individual during their training;
· the provider has an appropriate means of assessing the e-learning component of the training.
Employers should also ensure they are complying with regulation 13 of the Health and Safety Management Regulations 1999, which has a requirement to ensure adequate time is set aside during the working day to undertake any training employees receive.
-
Acceptable training/assessing qualifications
Below is a table outlining nationally recognises and acceptable training/assessing qualifications you should check your trainer holds.
Qualification | Train | Assess |
---|---|---|
A1 (D32/33) – Assess candidates using a range of methods | x | ✓ |
A2 (D32) – Assess candidates’ performance through observation | x | ✓ |
Cert Ed, PGCE, B Ed, M Ed | ✓ | ✓ |
CTLLS/DTLLS | ✓ | ✓ |
English National Board 998 | ✓ | ✓ |
Further and Adult Education Teacher’s Certificate | ✓ | ✓ |
IHCD Instructional Methods | ✓ | ✓ |
IHCD Instructor Certificate | ✓ | ✓ |
Learning and Development Unit 9D – Assess workplace competence using direct and indirect methods | x | ✓ |
Learning and Development Unit 9D1 – Assess workplace competence using direct and indirect methods | x | ✓ |
PTLLS | ✓ | x |
PTLLS with unit ‘Principles and Practice of Assessment’ | ✓ | ✓ |
QCF Qualifications based on the Learning and Development NOS for assessors | x | ✓ |
S/NVQ level 3 in training and development | ✓ | ✓ |
S/NVQ level 4 in training and development | ✓ | ✓ |
TQFE (Teaching Qualification for Further Education) | ✓ | ✓ |
Training Group A22, B22, C21, C23, C24 | ✓ | x |
Level 3 Award in Education & Training | ✓ | ✓ |
Level 4 Certificate in Education & Training | ✓ | ✓ |
Level 5 Diploma in Education & Training | ✓ | ✓ |